<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Vanity and it&#8217;s not Fair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adventuresofannek.com/2009/03/05/its-vanity-and-its-not-fair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adventuresofannek.com/2009/03/05/its-vanity-and-its-not-fair/</link>
	<description>A gal on a journey through some major life changes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 08:54:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelley at My Island Wedding</title>
		<link>http://adventuresofannek.com/2009/03/05/its-vanity-and-its-not-fair/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelley at My Island Wedding]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adventuresofannek.com/2009/03/05/its-vanity-and-its-not-fair#comment-426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God Katherine Hepburn looks fantastic!Love them all!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God Katherine Hepburn looks fantastic!Love them all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela</title>
		<link>http://adventuresofannek.com/2009/03/05/its-vanity-and-its-not-fair/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adventuresofannek.com/2009/03/05/its-vanity-and-its-not-fair#comment-425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree 150% with your review =)The look on my face in the candid you shot shows my disappointment, right? We don&#039;t put enough of a priority on film and negatives! Until they learn to replicate the layers and grain of film with digital, they really should stick to prints from negatives when available. They took something magical and turned it into a cheap digital print. I&#039;m surprised they didn&#039;t just throw a bunch of mypublisher books out for us to scope! It was about the same quality!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 150% with your review =)The look on my face in the candid you shot shows my disappointment, right? We don&#8217;t put enough of a priority on film and negatives! Until they learn to replicate the layers and grain of film with digital, they really should stick to prints from negatives when available. They took something magical and turned it into a cheap digital print. I&#8217;m surprised they didn&#8217;t just throw a bunch of mypublisher books out for us to scope! It was about the same quality!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

